How to Stop Elite Republican Plans to Take the GOP Down The Way of the Whigs

by Ralph Benko

GOP_Logo1_svgAmidst the Democratic Party meltdown might elite Republican Party  operatives snatch defeat from the jaws of victory?  Don’t rule it out.   Many elite Republicans lust to steer their party the way of the Whigs. The Whigs?  This month a candidate of the Whig Party, long believed extinct, won an election for the first time in 160 years.  This scoop was reported by MyFoxNY, Philadelphia voters elect Whig to public office.

This election was for a Philly election judge responsible for “overseeing equipment and procedures at the polls.”   The national Modern Whig Party reportedly claims, according to its national chairman, 30,000 members  (although most of these appear to be signups at its website).   Who  knew?

Making something of this small electoral victory is whimsical.  But it is not mere whimsy. Something more is afoot.

Something that whispers of an elite Republican political death wish.

Landslide (36 votes to his opponent’s 24) victor, now Judge, Robert “Heshy” Bucholz tells all to Fox NY:  “Bucholz said he joined the Whigs three years ago because of their  fiscally conservative but socially liberal views. They represent a  sensible ‘middle path’ between Democrats and Republicans….”

Fiscally conservative and socially liberal?  Where have we heard this before?  From powerful elements of the wannabe “Modern” Republican  Party, that’s where.  Elements within the GOP Establishment — hello  Steve Schmidt, I’m talking to you, among others — clearly aspire to  achieve, for the Republican Party, the glorious status of … the Whigs.

So … whatever happened to the Whigs?  As summarized by the Wikipedia:  “The party was ultimately destroyed by the question of whether to allow the expansion of slavery to the territories. … By the 1856 presidential election, the party was virtually defunct.”

The Whigs attempted to declare a truce in the political war over the  burning moral issue of the day: slavery.  Public intellectual (and  professional colleague of this columnist) Jeffrey Bell once observed: a  political party can recover from being wrong on a burning issue of the  day. It cannot recover from irrelevance.

The Democratic Party was the pro-slavery party.  The Democrats came  back from that debacle.  But a political party cannot afford to duck  and, thereby, make itself irrelevant.  That’s what the Whigs did.   Calling for a “truce” is electoral poison.

There are elitist forces at work within the GOP.  These are striving  mightily to adopt policies of “truce” that would make the GOP  irrelevant.  They are striving to get the GOP to embrace the very  platform of the Modern Whigs: a party of “fiscally conservative but  socially liberal views.”  Both planks represent bad policy and bad  politics.

The Republicans who are pushing the strategy of a “truce” on social  issues — like the Whig grandees who pushed for a truce on the issue of  slavery — are pushing the Grand Old Party toward the fate of the Whigs:  irrelevance and ignominy.  And on the economy what the GOP needs is a  platform of free-market-driven growth, not “fiscal conservatism.” That’s usually code for raising taxes and cutting entitlements.

As Frank Cannon, president of American Principles in Action (with which this columnist has a professional affiliation) wrote, in Politico, in 2010:

With the same tension that has existed in past efforts by  some GOP elites to play down social issues or envelop them in a “Big  Tent” — but with far more intensity than ever before — the perennial, or more properly quadrennial, identity crisis among Republicans is boiling to the surface.

It’s already clear where the glamour resides. The cachet is to be found with those elite Republican fund-raisers and political  maestros, who favor not just a tamping down of social issue activism but an embrace of avant-garde ideas like same-sex marriage.

The same cachet is bestowed on Steve Schmidt, the California-based  political consultant who guided John McCain’s 2008 campaign. Announcing  that he would co-sponsor a fund-raising cocktail party for the group  sponsoring the legal challenge to California’s pro-traditional marriage  Prop 8, Schmidt told The Huffington Post that there “is a conservative  case to be made in favor of gay marriage.”

Cachet like this is an intangible commodity that is worth its weight in gold. In Washington, however, it is usually purchased through one of two things – inherent  glamour (Hollywood) or victory at the ballot box. In politics, victory  is paramount.

Schmidt’s wizardry produced a 2008 presidential campaign that downplayed the differences between McCain and Barack Obama on social issues – including marriage. … The result? The cause of  traditional marriage prevailed in California by 600,000 votes. On the  same day, on the same ballot, McCain lost California by 24 percentage  points. Traditional marriage prevailed in Los Angeles County. McCain was buried there, following Schmidt’s advice. Some wizard. Some cachet.

Cannon, Maggie Gallagher and Rich Danker last month, through the  American Principles Project, of which Jeff Bell is policy director,  issued an indictment of the Republican National Committee’s “forensic  audit” of how it forfeited the 2012 elections.  It is entitled Building a Winning Coalition:  The Lessons of 2012.  This “autopsy of the autopsy” already has achieved wide note as a  critique of those who seek to shove the GOP down the same chute —  irrelevance — that extinguished the Whigs as a national party.

Building a Winning Coalition summarizes its findings:

We believe the conventional  explanation emerging from the Republican National Committee’s “autopsy”  report gets the core issues exactly wrong. Accepting this emerging  conventional wisdom will, in our view, likely consign the GOP to a  permanent minority status.

The conventional wisdom is  this: the national GOP lost in 2012 because extremist social issues hurt GOP candidates by distracting voters from our winning economic message.

There are only two problems with this analysis, in our view:

First, social issues (especially the life issues) do not hurt GOP candidates… they help them win elections.

Second, and most importantly, the GOP’s economic message as currently structured is not a winning message.

Republicans urgently need to  construct a conservative economic message that connects to working and  middle-class voters’ present economic concerns.

And the party elites need to  acknowledge the failure of the “truce model.” They need to adopt a  confident, integrated conservatism that will form a party eager to make  the case for the social issues in order to build a winning national  coalition, attracting Latinos and other non-white and blue collar  voters.

The outcome of the recent, hotly contested, Virginia gubernatorial  election — where the Republican Party refused to promote generously the  election of its conservative nominee — and where that nominee himself  neither campaigned on values issues nor presented a strong conservative  economic message connecting “to working and middle class voters’ present economic concerns” — provides yet more evidence in support of APP’s  conclusion.

Pursuing the Whig identity — to become a party of “fiscally  conservative but socially liberal views” — is, as the Whigs marginality  demonstrates, a recipe for trivializing the GOP — and electoral  disaster.  The elite Republican Establishment miscreants may succeed.

They may indeed succeed and thereby succeed in … shrinking membership in the Grand Old Party down to 30,000 members, akin to the Modern  Whigs.  Should they succeed may I offer, just before resigning my GOP  membership, the nomination of Steve Schmidt as the Party Chairman of a  tiny, and irrelevant, Republican Party?  May I have a second?

There is another way.  It portends — especially (in the opinion of  this columnist) if the Party will focus on religious liberty — a winning way.

First, social issues (especially the life issues) do not hurt GOP candidates… they help them win elections.

Second, … Republicans urgently need to construct a  conservative economic message that connects to working and middle-class  voters’ present economic concerns.

Will the GOP listen?  Or will it go the way of the Whigs?

Republished with permission from Forbes,com

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s